Cosmobet reviewDubois vs
Wardley

What can be verified about Cosmobet and this fight?

This Cosmobet review examines public documentation relevant to boxing and the completed Dubois vs Wardley rematch. An authenticated Cosmobet market archive for this event was not located in the sources checked.

That limits what a reliable event-specific review can say. The fight's sporting result is documented; Cosmobet's historical prices, selections, market wording and settlement decisions for it are not verified here. A list of common boxing bet types would not establish that this operator offered them on this bout.

The review was conducted without an account. It covers the public English-language site, its legal documents, the linked regulatory certificate and the official boxing result. Account access, payment performance, live betting and customer-service response times were not tested.

The boxing details an operator rulebook needs to resolve

Cosmobet links to Sportsbook Terms in its footer. During this check, that destination displayed an incomplete page without readable boxing settlement provisions.

This is a finding about the public page seen on the review date, rather than proof that no rules exist elsewhere. The topics below explain the missing evidence; they are not a list of confirmed Cosmobet markets.

Read the operator's Sportsbook Terms destination. General explanations of the vocabulary appear in our boxing betting terminology guide; another bookmaker's rules cannot fill gaps in Cosmobet's contract.

Which operator and documents does this review concern?

The cosmobet.com footer identifies Santeda International B.V., company number 151296, and licence identifier OGL/2024/1798/1048. The linked CGA certificate displayed an Active status during this check.

There is a dated-source difference: the CGA's register PDF updated 14 October 2026 lists that identifier with an Assessment in progress status. The register page itself cautions that its overviews do not guarantee current validity. This review records those sources without resolving the discrepancy. The linked certificate concerns Curaçao; it is not evidence of authorisation in Great Britain.

For readers in Great Britain, the Gambling Commission public register is the separate reference for checking an operator's British authorisation. This review does not establish a British licence for Cosmobet. Similarly named websites and other operators' boxing rules were excluded from the review.

General terms relevant to a settlement query

The general terms say that obvious-error bets may be cancelled and describe discretionary treatment of accidentally accepted late pre-match bets. These clauses do not prove that live coverage or any particular selection was available for Dubois vs Wardley.

The same document's complaints section provides a designated email contact and asks for complaints within two months of the issue. It also gives the operator's server records precedence in a disagreement. These are summaries of the operator's stated terms, rather than a finding that a disputed outcome is correct.

For a historical settlement review, relevant records would include the original confirmation, exact selection text, timestamp, applicable rule version and the operator's explanation. The CGA contact page states that the authority does not handle individual player–operator disputes; it should not be described as a guaranteed route to repayment.